多名女孩被输送给河北人大代表、公安、富商

Lawyers for Huawei’s chief financial officer have won a court battle after
a judge asked Canada’s attorney general to hand over more evidence and
documents relating to the arrest of Meng Wanzhou, according to a court
ruling released on Tuesday.

Meng’s legal team has contested her extradition in the Canadian courts on
grounds that the United States is using it for economic and political gain,
and that she was unlawfully held, searched and interrogated by Canadian
authorities acting for the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).

Associate Chief Justice Heather Holmes in the Supreme Court of British
Columbia agreed with Huawei Technologies Co Ltd’s appeal for Canada's
attorney general to release more documents relating to the run-up to and
events of the arrest.

Meng’s team believes the papers will support its claim of an abuse of
process.

Holmes cautioned that her ruling was limited and does not address the merit
of Huawei’s allegations that Canadian authorities improperly handled
identifying information about Meng’s electronic devices.

The Department of Justice told Reuters Canada's attorney general was
reviewing the decision to determine what fell within the scope of the
disclosure order, in order to comply with it.

"Ms. Meng is being afforded a fair process before the British Columbia
Supreme Court in accordance with extradition law and our treaty with the
United States," a spokesman added. "This will continue throughout these
proceedings."

Huawei declined to comment.

Meng, 47, was arrested at the Vancouver International Airport on Dec. 1,
2018, at the request of the United States, where she is charged with bank
fraud and accused of misleading the bank HSBC (HSBA.L) about Huawei
Technologies’ business in Iran. She has said she is innocent and is
fighting extradition.

She was questioned by Canadian immigration authorities prior to her arrest,
and her lawyers have asked the government to hand over more documents about
her arrest.

In her ruling, Holmes wrote that she found the evidence tendered by the
attorney general to have "notable gaps," citing the example of why the
Canadian Border Services Agency (CBSA) "made what is described as the simple
error of turning over to the RCMP (Royal Canadian Mounted Police), contrary
to law, the passcodes CBSA officers had required Ms. Meng to produce."

Holmes also said the attorney general did not provide adequate evidence to "
rebut inferences from other evidence that the RCMP improperly sent serial
numbers and other identifiers of Ms. Meng’s devices to the FBI."

Holmes said the gaps in evidence raised questions "beyond the frivolous or
speculative about the chain of events," and led her to conclude that Meng’s
application "crosses the air of reality threshold."

The order does not require the disclosure of documents - the attorney
general may assert a privilege, which Meng could contest in court.

No timeline was outlined in Holmes’ ruling.

Meng’s extradition hearing will begin on Jan. 20, 2020, in a federal court
in Vancouver.

(Reporting by David Kirton in Shenzhen and Moira Warburton in Toronto;
Editing by Matthew Lewis and Clarence Fernandez)